jump to navigation

BOYCOTT ISRAEL TODAY May 31, 2010

Posted by infidelkafirwatch in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Dear visitors,

Today it is a sad day for Humanity.  Israel has shown the world that it is a terrorist state who opperate a zionist law, which is above any law.

It is the duty for everyone to voice their anger and frustration and to send out a message to this terrorism state that enough is enough.

One way is to Boycott Israel Today.  Please visit this blog and show you support and most important of all is to spread the word.

Visit – BOYCOTT ISRAEL TODAY

Advertisements

Israel: 10 killed in Gaza flotilla massacre May 31, 2010

Posted by infidelkafirwatch in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , ,
add a comment

VIDEOS AVAILABLE AT THE END OF THIS POST

VOICE YOU ANGER NOW – SUPPORT ‘BOYCOTT ISRAEL TODAY’

visit ‘BOYCOTT ISRAEL TODAY‘ to voice you anger and support the boycott

Shock and outrage sweep through the world over a deadly Israeli strike on a Gaza-bound aid flotilla as protests erupt across the globe in condemnation of the attack.

On Monday, both foes and allies of Tel Aviv across the world closed ranks by condemning the early Monday raid on the six-ship Gaza Freedom Flotilla, which reportedly left some 20 people killed, mostly Turk nationals, and scores wounded.

In Turkey, hundreds of angry protesters took to the streets of Istanbul and gathered in front of Israel’s consulate, shouting anti-Israeli slogans.

Also in the Turkish capital, Ankara, police struggled to contain hundreds of outraged demonstrators outside the residence of the Israeli ambassador.

Thousands of people took to the streets of Jordanian capital Amman, urging the government to shut down the Israeli embassy. The furious protesters also called for an end to the years-long Israeli blockade of Gaza.

Both Jordan and Turkey summoned the Israeli ambassador over the lethal attack.

In Kuwait, the parliament has held an emergency meeting over the Israeli raid on the Gaza aid fleet, which was carrying 16 Kuwaitis including an MP, the official KUNA news agency reported.

Iraq has also slammed the attack as a “new humanitarian disaster.”

Khairallah al-Basri, a member of current premier Nouri al-Maliki’s State of Law coalition, however, said the attack was not “unique” as such “shameful” Israeli crimes occurred every once in a while amidst global silence.

Arab League chief Amr Moussa had earlier slammed the raid as a “crime”, saying the 22-country body was consulting to decide on its next step against Israel.

In Europe, condemnations were equally swift, as Sweden, Greece, Spain, Denmark and Norway summoned Israeli envoys.

According to al-Aqsa television, at least 20 people were killed and 50 others injured when the Israeli navy stormed the Gaza Freedom Flotilla early on Monday. The convoy was intercepted in international waters, some 150km (90 miles) off the coast of Gaza. [source]

See Videos below:

Molly Morris – the New Salman Rushdie May 22, 2010

Posted by infidelkafirwatch in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , ,
add a comment

Following on from a post earlier relating to the deliberate religious incitement, I have to admit that I find Molly Morris to be the new Salman Rushdie.  It’s not the first time such ‘Salman Rushdies’ have appeared and disappeared just as fast.

Although I stand by what was posted earlier that our response has to be calculated, I still hope the new Salman Rushdie ‘Molly Morris’ has a similar fate, one of hiding and away from public domain.  Muslims have every right to defend themselves and their beliefs and I strongly believe that Molly Morris should be held accountable and responsible for her actions including the rage of the Muslims around the world.

Molly Morris – Deliberate Religious Incitement May 22, 2010

Posted by infidelkafirwatch in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

We haven’t yet fully recovered from the aftermath of the Danish cartoon controversy and a whole new menace is upon us. Last month, the Comedy Central show ‘South Park’ self-censored an episode meant to feature Prophet Muhammad after receiving threats from a New York-based extremist group. As a result of that censorship, artists – claiming to be defenders of free speech – have responded by organising an event they call “Draw A Muhammad Day” on May 20.

The campaign claims to be an attempt to defend the freedom of speech. But a Facebook group used for campaigning the event has been widely condemned. The blogosphere, Twitter, and Facebook have been abuzz with counter-groups and protests. Facebook users are calling for a site-wide boycott to object to the fact that the social networking site has failed to remove the page, despite it being reported for offensive content numerous times.

Pakistani blogger Awab Alvi raises valid points regarding Facebook’s stance on the campaign:

I believe this might be a good case study on how tolerant Facebook administration might actually be. On one hand they are quick to delete the facebook page of a civil activist group [Peoples Resistance] which was organizing street protests in Karachi on the mere whim that we might be promoting hatred and violence, while in reality we were peacefully protesting against a military dictatorship, our democratic right – that group was deleted quickly and the administrators were issued warnings, this group continues to reign supreme raking over 34,400 fans since April 25th.

Alvi also mentions an interesting point that redefines the campaign’s claims of freedom of speech, providing a link to a radio interview by Molly Morris, the force behind the campaign. When asked if she would draw or make fun of the Holocaust, Morris replies, “No, there is nothing funny about it.” Moreover, owing to the frenzy that followed after the campaign was launched, Morris has published a disclaimer on her website declaring her disassociation with the campaign.

Laughably, the campaign website also claims that the point is not to promote certain “personal/political/religious” messages, but to show the world that “we’re not afraid to depict Muhammad.” But, the question remains, who is the target audience for such a campaign? And what is the purpose of a mass campaign that has the potential to target and offend people of a certain religion? The truth is that ‘South Park’ has a wide viewership, which includes Muslims who have remained silent or protested peacefully despite knowing about the about ‘South Park’ caricatures of Prophet Muhammad for years. It was only recently that a New York-based Muslim group lead a campaign titled ‘The Defense of the Prophet Campaign’ to condemn the caricatures.

Part of the campaign included a seven-minute YouTube video titled ‘Help Us Remove This Filth,’ showing pictures of the dead body of Dutch filmmaker Theo Van Gough, who was murdered in November 2002 in reaction to his film ‘Submission’. It was this campaign, which was seen as a direct threat, that led to ‘South Park’ being self-censored. No doubt, the group crossed the line by issuing such a threat to the creators of ‘South Park.’ For that they should be properly prosecuted in accordance with American law.

Given the aggressive and inappropriate content of the ‘Defense of the Prophet Campaign’, the Facebook campaign can be understood as a direct response to the extreme actions of a particular Muslim group. But doesn’t anyone realise that “Draw a Muhammad Day” is nothing more than a discriminatory campaign aimed at hurting Muslims worldwide? The Facebook campaign makes an extreme group of Muslim bloggers representative of the entire Muslim community and shows no regard for the millions of Muslims who have used their right to protest peacefully against offensive iconography. If the Facebook campaign is truly directed against those who stifle free speech, shouldn’t it target the group directly responsible, rather than the Muslim community at large?

The fact is, the New York-based group has earned quite a dubious reputation, even among American-Muslims. In the words of Ahmed Rehab, executive director, Council of American-Islamic Relations, Chicago:

The “Muslims” in this case are a group of literally 5-10 people who are widely reviled by the mainstream community for their radical and confrontational style including harassing Muslims outside mosques (where they tend to be banned) with outlandishly provocative anti-American rhetoric. Most suspect the group is fraudulent. Its mysterious leader, born Joseph Cohen, is an American Jew who converted to Islam in 2000 after living in Israel and attending an orthodox rabbinical school there. Whether true Muslims or agent provocateurs, the result is the same: they are five community outcasts.

Although it is clear that this small, fringe, extremist community chose to hit out against ‘South Park,’ the news headlines have stated, ‘Muslims attack freedom of speech once again.’ In these tense times, there should be more responsible reporting, and more thoughtful – and proportional – responses to the activities of certain Muslims of an extremist bent, who are often sidelined within their own communities.

That said, this can also be an occasion for self-reflection for the Muslim community at large. The truth is that there are plenty of people out there who will be willing to support the death threats against the creators of ‘South Park’ and join violent protests to register their condemnation. We, too, need to pause and re-think our options. Are death threats, violent outbursts, burning tires, and other acts of aggression really the way forward? Don’t they simply add more fuel to the controversy, draw more publicity to fringe activities, and further malign the image of the global Muslim community? The fact is, the best response to free speech campaigners is an attempt by the Muslim community to use its own right to freedom of expression to register protest and call for an end to offensive campaigns.

Let’s act rationally once and for all, and help change the trend of the freedom-of-speech excuse being used to justify discriminatory campaigns. Most importantly, let’s sort out the issue of representation. The Muslim community at large – and not a fringe, extreme element – should retain the power to decide how to react to such situations. If our stance is that of peaceful condemnation, then we must rid ourselves of those who behave otherwise. The “Draw a Muhammad Day” campaign appears to be nothing more than a desperate attempt to incite and provoke Muslims – let’s not give them the satisfaction.

[source]

Israel & Top Ten Truths May 9, 2010

Posted by infidelkafirwatch in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Over at Rehmat’s World blog, an article which give you 10 truths about Israel.  Truth can never be denied and if you do deny truth then innocent people pay the price.

One of Israeli Hasbara (propaganda) organs, Simon Wiesenthal Center has produced a brochure titled “2010 Top Ten Anti-Israel Lies” for the tens of thousands of Israel Hasbara Committee members and IT operatives to counter the success of Israel’s delegitimization process by the anti-Zionist-regime movements and bloggers. The multi-million dollar project will distribute 500,000 of copies of the brochure to shore-up Israel’s failing PR. The brochure provides the Zionist narration of State of Isreal’s history and its commitment to peace in the Middle East and the world at large.

I would like to debunk this Zionist narration based on historical facts.

Lie 1: Israel was created by European guilt over the Nazi holocaust. Why should Palestinian pay the price?

Why would European feel guilt over Nazi holocaust which was committed by the Nazis who had 150,000 German Jews among them? Furthermore, before the 20th century, Jewish communities were expelled from almost every European country. The expulsion had nothing to do with ‘anti-Semitism’ as the vast majority of 12.7 million world Jewish population is either Khazars or Berbers and not Semite people of Israelite tribes. And why they were expelled? Who would know better than Herzl Theodor, who said: “Each country can only absorb a limited number of Jews, if she doesn\’t want disorder in her stomach. Germany has alread too many Jews“. During the persecution of Jews under Nazi Germany, it were the leaders of World Zionist movement who compaigned in Britain, the US and Canada – not to let European Jews enter those countries because it will fuel the existing ‘anti-Semitism’. It was only the West Germans under US Occupation who ended up paying US$93 billion as compensation for Nazi crimes. The Americans who did not take part in the holocaust – had been made to pay more than US$3,000 billion since 1970s.

Lie 2: Had Israel withdrwan to its June 1967 borders, peace would have come long ago.

Israel never had internationally recognized borders as pre-1967 it had already occupied more Palestinian land awarded to the Jews by the Western powers through the notorious Balfour Declaration and United Nations in 1948. Furthermore, Zionists’ dream of Eretz Israel cannot be achieved in a peaceful Middle East. They believed that continuous conflicts and wars were necessary for the survival of the Zionist colonial power. Professor Benny Morris in his book ‘The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949′; published in 1987 – documented the expulsion of 700,000 Native Muslim and Christian Palestinians by the armed Jew terrorist militias.

Lie 3: Israel is the main stumbling block to achieving a two-state solution.

The so-called two-state solution, which is not acceptable to Zionist leaders having a sovereign and fully militarized Palestinian state bordering Israel. The agenda behind the slogan is to make Zionist occupation of Arab Palestine permanent. It was the brainchild of the pro-Israel US President Dubya Bush, who, in 2003 declared that Palestinian need a separate state aka a Palestinian Bantustan. While Bush Zionist administration was pushing the PA leaders to accept the “Two-state” solution – one state (88% of Palestinian land) for Jews only and the other for the Native Muslims and Christians on the remaining land (22%) – Tel Aviv kept establishing new Jewish settlements on Arab lands; kidnapping and murdering civilians in both Gaza Strip and the West Bank to make sure that Palestinian are left with no choice but to keep their resistance against the Jewish occupiers of their Motherland.

Lie 4: Nuclear Israel, not Iran, is the greatest threat to peace and stability.

In fact, it’s the truth. Iran has invaded not a single of its neighbors for over 100 years while Israel has invaded all its neighbor and has occupied Syrian, Lebanese and Palestinian Territories. Professor Jeffrey Rudolph in Can You Pass The Iran Quiz? proves that Israel is “the problem”.

Lie 5: Israel is an apartheid state deserving international boycott, divestment and sanctions campaigns.

True and much more. The Zionist entity is a colonial state and not a democratic state.

Lie 6: Plans to build 1,600 more new homes in Jerusalem proves Israel is “Judaizing” the Holy City.

Well, if those homes are given to the pro-Israel Zionist Christians – Israel would not be blamed for “Judaizing” the Holy City.

Lie 7: Israeli policies endanger US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

I would rather let the Zionism\’s military poodle, General David Petraeus, (ADL national director Abraham Foxman called him a “Jew Baiter”  for naming Israel as the trouble-maker) answer it. The General in a memo to Admiral Mullen wrote: “America’s perceived support of – or at least acquiescene in – Israel’s more inflammatory policies endangers American troops abroad. In the long run, it will also endanger American civilians at home, funnelling more terrorisn in their direction”.

Lie 8: Israeli policies are the cause of worldwide anti-Semitism.

Partly true. According to a research conducted by Bielefeld University western hatred toward Muslims have decreased over the past year while the hatred of Jews is growing. Israelis are genuinely concerned. The sudden drop in Islamophobia doesn’t fit into the Zionist global plan in which Muslims are cornered and ostracised as reactionaries while Israel is dropping bombs in the name of democracy and liberalism.

Lie 9: Israel, not Hamas, is responsible for the “humanitarian catastrophe” in Gaza. Goldstein was right when he charged that Israel was guilty of war crimes against civilians.

Now who would know Israeli Zionist Jews’ crimes better than a South African Zionist Jew Judge Goldstein?

Lie 10: The only hope for peace is a single, binational state eliminating the Jewish State of Israel.

Neither United States or United Nations recognize Israel as a “Jewish State” – because it’s not a Jewish State.

[source]

I’m back… May 8, 2010

Posted by infidelkafirwatch in Uncategorized.
add a comment

Dear everyone,

Most of you would have noticed that I have not blogged here for a while.  Thank you all for your comments and support including both Muslims and non-Muslims.

However, I am now back and will start to blog again and put forward to you information for you to make up your minds.

I will try to change the format and design of this blog, I also need to formally write a blog post aimed to my viewers (both Muslims and non-Muslims) and to bring to light how we (Muslims and non-Muslims) can work together to get rid of the bigger evil.  Wait for this article and I hope you all continue to visit this blog and contribute towards it.