jump to navigation

Republican candidate advocates threat to bomb Islamic holy sites – Islamaphobic Terrorism August 3, 2007

Posted by infidelkafirwatch in Uncategorized.

Yet again Islamaphobic terrorism under the banner of Politics.  The republican candidate should understand that US is more likely to get hit by a Russian Nuclear missile than one from an Islamic Country.  This is clearly Islamaphobic terrorism and inciting tension at political level.  This is not an issue as yet since no true Muslim leader has said anything in return, if they did then what ever they said would be on the newspapers front page. 


Republican presidential hopeful Tom Tancredo says the best way he can think of to deter a nuclear terrorist attack on the U.S. is to threaten to retaliate by bombing Islamic holy sites.

The Colorado congressman on Tuesday told about 30 people at a town hall meeting in the state of Iowa that he believes such a terrorist attack could be imminent and that the U.S. needs to hurry up and think of a way to stop it.

“If it is up to me, we are going to explain that an attack on this homeland of that nature would be followed by an attack on the holy sites in Mecca and Medina,” Tancredo said at the Family Table restaurant. “Because that’s the only thing I can think of that might deter somebody from doing what they otherwise might do.”

A Washington-based Islamic civil rights and advocacy group responded in anger Thursday, calling Tancredo’s statement “unworthy of anyone seeking public office in the United States.”

“Perhaps it’s evidence of a long-shot candidate grasping at straws and trying to create some kind of a controversy that might appeal to a niche audience of anti-Muslim bigots,” said Ibrahim Hooper, spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations.




1. George Carty - August 4, 2007

To paraphrase Talleyrand, “nuking Mecca would be worse than a crime, it would be a mistake.”

What better bloody shirt would the al-Qaeda terrorists have to wave, than a nuked Mecca?

2. infidelkafirwatch - August 5, 2007

But besides Al-Qaeda, this action or language is “act of terrorism” even if it is NON-MUSLIM saying it. Had this been said by any Muslim person then this would have been noticed as terrorism.

Al-Qaeda does not represent the entire Muslim population and will never do. So for the act of a few CIA’s funded people, aiding CIA’s and USA plans, how can this language be tolerated?

This is Islamaphobic Terrorism

3. Infidel Parrot - August 9, 2007

Hello Americaphobes,
Notice that Tancredo is so unpopular that he doesn’t even appear in the polls. Also, notice that Tancredo only advocates nuking your holy cities in retaliation for a large-scale terrorist attack. Know what that means? According to Tancredo, it’s up to your terrorists whether or not these cities get vaporized. To me that means you’d better stop protecting your terrorists and start policing yourselves.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: